This type scenario is one reason I've been thinking a no garnish rule being the way to go.
To me it makes no sense to tell a judge "it's not a garnish competition" then rule out certain types of garnish like red leaf etc. If it's not a garnish comp and we're supposed to judge
only the meat then why are some greens outlawed and why do they spend sooo much time in judging class on the subject?
This sends conflicting messages to people, especially new judges. In other words if it's not about the garnish then why does it matter what you use and why add more controversy? Judging is subjective enough without adding another subjective "artistic" component to it.
Just my thoughts so far...